If you are asking yourself this question, this article is for you; it presents my solution and the reasons why I chose this hardware upgrade.
The Explore Scientific tripod supplied with the iEXOS-100 equatorial mount was designed with a single goal, to be lightweight and portable, however it lacks mechanical stability and cannot handle the equatorial head's maximum weight capacity.
This upgrade results in reduced vibrations during extended observation sessions, fewer micro movements caused by wind during long exposures and an improved ability for the equatorial head to handle its maximum load limits (while minimizing tracking errors).
For my hardware configuration, you will need these two accessories :If you click on "LINK," you will be directed straight to the product webpage (current links that may change over time).This upgrade results in reduced vibrations during extended observation sessions, fewer micro movements caused by wind during long exposures and an improved ability for the equatorial head to handle its maximum load limits (while minimizing tracking errors).
I have no direct or indirect business relationship with Explore Scientific, GEOPTIK or SkyWatcher. I am writing this article solely to share my experiences as a hobbyist.
By using the Explore Scientific kit (see photo above) the equatorial head will be compatible with the HEQ5 standard, though not fully compatible for reasons I will explain later.
In any case, this accessory kit is essential for the hardware adaptation.
.jpg)
It is worth noting that this is a German/Italian product currently available only online.
In my opinion it is one of the most mechanically stable solutions available.
There are other ways to achieve the same result but this isn't the time to discuss them.
I chose GEOPTIK and have no regrets, I do not need to use a pier (extension column) for my astronomical observations.
This small adapter you see above is part of the "magic" that makes compatibility between the equatorial head and the tripod simple and possible.
However, there is a problem though it is easily solvable and I’ll explain how.
In the meantime here are a few photos (remember, you can click on them to view them at full size) showing part of the work in its semi finished state :
Now let me explain the problem that prevents the immediate use of this hardware configuration.
The central threaded rod securing the equatorial head to the tripod has about 5mm of "mechanical play / tollerance".
You won't be able to tighten the equatorial head firmly against the tripod's mounting base.
You can solve this problem by purchasing 5~6mm spacers with a 12mm (M12) center hole.
The photos below will make this clearer.
Alternatively, you can use multiple flat washers with an M12 center hole (or 1/2" if you have trouble finding metric parts).
Once that's done, you'll be able to enjoy your new hardware setup without any issues !
With its 3-inch legs the SkyWatcher tripod vastly outperforms the original in terms of stability.
It is like a David and Goliath scenario ... .
If you already own an EQ6 standard tripod your hardware setup will be less portable and heavier but the benefits during astronomical observations will be significant.
Remember that the equatorial head's maximum weight and precision limits will not change.
What will improve is the mechanical stability ... specifically, reduced susceptibility to mechanical vibrations and a greater ability to support the equatorial head in handling the maximum payload (which remains unchanged from the original).
As previously mentioned the only changes will be the ability to dampen micro vibrations and the mechanical stability under load.
I wish everyone happy stargazing.
Astro KMan
